There is a word that comes up often when talking about places like this. A word used so many times it has almost lost its meaning: authentic.
Authentic resorts. Authentic experiences. Authentic flavours. Authentic travel. Everything authentic, everything packaged, everything for sale. And underneath, often, nothing — or worse, the life, the traditions, the history and the sacrifices of those who are, turned into scenography for those who only want to seem.
Le Piracante does not want to seem anything. It does not need to seem anything. Because it is — a context of life and work, of daily choices and daily sacrifices, of beauty that lasts instead of the ephemeral beauty of objects, of constant learning because every day you can and sometimes must learn to do concrete things. Here the problem to solve is understanding why a plant won’t grow, finding a way to fix something with what you have, taking care of a context that does not wait for you but responds to you, if you listen.
This is the starting point. Everything else comes from here.
The inner areas: not a problem to solve, but a context to inhabit.
The central issue is this: Italy’s inner areas — the territories far from the coasts, the motorways, the major flows of people and economy — are almost always described through what they lack. Services are missing. Young people are missing. Connections, economy. This perspective — though grounded in real data — turns them into a problem to be solved, and those who live there become automatically either a remnant of the past or an admirable case of resilience. In both cases, a gaze from the outside that does not belong to the place and that, in truth, does not help.
Framing the opposite means changing the subject of the sentence: not “what is missing” but “what is here and gives this place its identity”, not “how do we save it” but “how do we live here”. It means recognising that certain places hold a relationship with time, with the land, with the rhythm of the seasons that urban contexts have lost — and that this is not backwardness, it is a value that requires competence, awareness and choice to be truly inhabited. It also means distinguishing a borgo — a historic village rooted in its territory — from a suburban neighbourhood.
Being inside, not looking from the outside. Because staying is a cultural act.
There is a subtle but important difference between those who live in an inner area by birth and those who do so by choice. It is not a hierarchy — both perspectives are necessary, both bring something. But whoever chooses to stay, or to arrive and put down roots, performs an act that is cultural in nature before it is economic or sentimental.
Choosing a “slow” place in a world that rewards speed. Choosing the complexity of an under-infrastructured territory when everything around pushes toward immediate comfort. Choosing to learn to do things — concrete things, things you touch with your hands — instead of always delegating them to someone else or to some service.
This choice is not romantic. It has real costs: distance from services, isolation in difficult moments, the effort of building something where the conditions do not meet you halfway. Anyone who truly lives in an inner area knows this — and those who don’t, have probably only been here on holiday.
But the choice also brings something that is hard to find elsewhere: the landscape as an active inheritance, not a museum to visit. The care of the territory as a concrete form of citizenship. The sense of belonging to a place that changes with the seasons and asks you to change with it.
Cyclical time against linear time.
One of the deepest differences between living in a rural inner area and living in the city is not in the services, the rhythms, or the distances. It is in time.
Urban time is linear and productive: it goes from A to B, measured in results, in progress, in goals achieved. The time of the countryside, of the small borghi, of the so-called “inner areas” is cyclical. Like the seasons that indicate the right moment to sow, plant, harvest, prune. Cyclical like the maintenance that a house of at least 200 years constantly requires. Cyclical like the many small details that become habits, but also security, tradition, care.
Life here is more centred on what is needed and what is useful, on what lasts. It measures the value of things differently: not how much they are liked, but how much they remain. Not how much they attract, but how much they resist — time, wear, the changing of trends. Rather than what seduces for an instant and is then forgotten.
Living in this time does not mean being slow in the sense of lazy or behind. It means being present in a different way — attentive to what changes, capable of waiting without the waiting being a waste. It is exactly what the slogans about “slow travel” and dolce far niente — the sweetness of doing nothing — try to evoke without ever truly explaining. Because in the end few really know it, and above all, it cannot be explained — it must be lived.
This place is not a set. Whoever comes here is not buying an experience. They are entering a life.
Choosing a place to live in does not mean owning it. Respect for a rural context begins with recognising that it existed before us and that, if we alter it, it simply destroys itself — loses character, becomes less liveable, more uncomfortable and identical to a thousand others. And at that point there is nothing left to inhabit, nor to visit.
All of this has a direct translation in the way we welcome guests at Le Piracante.
Whoever chooses to stay here is not purchasing an experience package with a fake-rustic fruit basket on the bedside table and a guaranteed sunset from the terrace. They are entering, for a few days, a real life — with its rhythms, its scents, its imperfections and its concrete beauty. A life in which breakfast is prepared with simple produce and traditional recipes, in which the garden needs care and not only photographs, in which silence is not an optional extra but the normal condition.
The guest who finds all this precious does not need everything to be perfect. They need everything to be real. And this kind of guest — the one we call an “anima affine”, a kindred spirit — is not attracted by the right advertising campaign or by photographs filtered in the correct way. They are recognised when they arrive, because they carry the same gaze: curious, attentive, willing to stay.
Slow tourism, when it is authentic and not just another outfit to wear for the weekend, works exactly like this. It is not a product. It is an encounter between those who inhabit a place and those who choose it consciously — knowing what they will find and what they will not.
Being instead of appearing. A position, not a slogan.
There is a paradox in all of this: the experiential tourism market is growing precisely because people are tired of paying for things that only seem. The “real” has become rare, and therefore sought after. But this search risks turning the “real” into the new object of consumption — the new luxury, the new trend, the new slogan.
The difference lies in who tells the story and from where they tell it. A resort built on cleared fields that sells itself as “immersed in the authentic nature of the countryside” is using the history and landscape of a territory as scenography, having at the very least altered it if not destroyed it. Le Piracante has no scenography. It has a history — that of a restored masseria, of choices made one by one, of a place that existed before us and that we hope will exist after us — and that history is not built to be told. It is lived, and then, eventually, recounted.
It is not moral superiority. It is simply a difference of position: we are inside, not outside. And from the inside everything looks different — the effort, the beauty, the complexity, the value of what remains when the trends pass. Our greatest virtue is perhaps the capacity to stay without altering. To act without imposing. To not bring here what belongs to the city or to industrial contexts, to not pretend to control nature with chemistry, to recognise that this place was inhabited before us — by plants, animals, people, stories — and that our task is not to transform it into something more comfortable, more similar to the city, more controllable — but to take care of it and contribute to increasing its value: for those who live here, for those who visit, for the community that surrounds it and that holds its memory more than anyone else.
The inner areas are not a problem to solve. They are a context to inhabit — with awareness, with choice, with all the weight and all the lightness that this choice carries with it.
We inhabit it. And when someone comes to stay here, for a few days, they inhabit it with us.
Articoli Blog © 2026 di Rossella Puoti è concesso in licenza con CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
